Showing posts with label FACT CHECK. Show all posts
Showing posts with label FACT CHECK. Show all posts

Saturday, September 7, 2019

Donald Trump Highlights Media Bias with a Sharpie

If you are a still watching CNN , MSNBC and the rest of the legacy media you are a major part of the problem at this point. The latest example of left wing anti-Trump hysteria is called #Sharpiegate.

As usual, the latest media spin starts with a POTUS tweet.


Alabama was NEVER in a predicted path of Hurricane Dorian they insist.  The usual mantra of Trump is a liar and crazy are pushed by his deranged critics.  In fact, 'altering' the map is ILLEGAL and surely is another reason to impeach the POTUS. 


Altered maps and criminal activity just to prove that Alabama was possibly in the path of Hurricane Doran. How low can Donald Trump go the collective asks each other ?


Donald Trump, Mr. Wrong is crazy and we can prove it yet again the legacy media assured their readers who share the same affliction of Trump Derangement syndrome.



Except the evidence to the contrary was easy to find.



Even NOAA backs Donalds Trump statement


The state sponsored broadcaster NPR laments the fact that NOAA states the FACT that Alabama was in the path prediction model.


But that won't stop the legacy media and their anti-Trump allies from refusing to stop their lies pushing 'Sharpiegate' .  The eye of Sharpiegate storm has passed but the spin is still dangerous.



Just another reminder that FAKE NEWS is a danger to us all.


Lets fact check CNN with ...... CNN .....

As the saying goes, CNN is FAKE NEWS.




Friday, May 12, 2017

Poliitfact's Mostly False Claim About Donald Trump

Continually revisiting the failed Clinton campaign narrative of a Putin-Trump conspiracy in election 2016 is a favorite past time of any form of Never Trumper. The red-baiting is polling well for the Democrats and it appears it is also great ratings for their allies in the media. Speaking of Democrats and propaganda, have you seen "Poltifact" today?


Read the article if you care to examine their word play or you can just believe you own lying eyes and watch James Clapper in his own words ....


The Obama administration was caught spying on an opposition candidate for President of the United States who ending up winning the election. Awkward indeed.  Somehow the story isn't about Susan Rice unmasking the names of their opposition during an election.  Strange Indeed.





Sunday, November 29, 2015

Syrians: NBC's Chuck Todd Attacks Donald Trump

Sunday morning means it is time to watch Chuck Todd embarrass himself on Meet The Press.  Saying Chuck is biased and a hack is an understatement and today was no exception.  NBC, the same network that was caught "selectively editing" George Zimmerman's 911 call and was the home of the pathological liar Brian Williams as their nightly news anchor, still thinks the public views their news organization as credible. That brings us to the Trump interview this morning. Chick Todd's "fact check" of Donald Trump didn't go so well.



The Obama administration has no intention of telling the truth to the American public or working with a GOP Congress.  The 10,000 figure cited by this administration are just Syrian refugees resettled  under the UNHCR program. More importantly, this administration has lied about immigration, abused its executive powers and knowingly broken the law to further its agenda. The 'Syrian refugee' crisis was Obama's own making, just like the rules he thinks he only has to obey. In fact, Obama's public pledge of 100,000 refugees already exceeds his 2016 estimate of 85,000 he submitted to Congress in October. The change from 70,000 to 100,000 doesn't include even more Syrians? Is the new 'cap' believable?   Since the process of notification requires good faith estimates, the Obama administration is free to abuse this process as well. The report in full

Proposed Refugee Admissions for Fiscal Year 2016.

The attack on Trump by the media while giving Obama a free pass for 2 terms is a big reason for Donald Trump's appeal. He fights back.  The fact check by Chuck Todd and Andrea Mitchell was incomplete and  laughable at best.



The Democrats running for office want 65,000 per year and yet it would be impossible for this administration to be planning for even more or for Donald Trump to have been told about such a plan for 100,000 ?  If that number isn't believable, tell that to the Germans.

Germany now expects 1.5 million refugees in 2015

The attacks on Trump take many forms, but the tweets saying that Donald Trump was using a fake Obama tweet were priceless.




The tweet in question....


Friday, August 21, 2015

Dozens of Hillary Clinton Emails Were Classified from the Start, U.S. Rules Suggest

Hillary Clinton's falsehoods in regards to her private email server and classified information are discredited weekly as even more information comes to light.  A few excerpts from an exclusive by Reuters..... 

Exclusive: Dozens of Clinton emails were classified from the start, U.S. rules suggest
For months, the U.S. State Department has stood behind its former boss Hillary Clinton as she has repeatedly said she did not send or receive classified information on her unsecured, private email account, a practice the government forbids.
MSNBC Fact Checks Hillary Clinton’s False Statements About Classified Emails dated 7/27/2015
While the department is now stamping a few dozen of the publicly released emails as "Classified," it stresses this is not evidence of rule-breaking. Those stamps are new, it says, and do not mean the information was classified when Clinton, the Democratic frontrunner in the 2016 presidential election, first sent or received it. 
But the details included in those "Classified" stamps — which include a string of dates, letters and numbers describing the nature of the classification — appear to undermine this account, a Reuters examination of the emails and the relevant regulations has found. 
The new stamps indicate that some of Clinton's emails from her time as the nation's most senior diplomat are filled with a type of information the U.S. government and the department's own regulations automatically deems classified from the get-go — regardless of whether it is already marked that way or not. 
Hillary Clinton quote from the U.N. Press Conference March 10, 2015
In the small fraction of emails made public so far, Reuters has found at least 30 email threads from 2009, representing scores of individual emails, that include what the State Department's own "Classified" stamps now identify as so-called 'foreign government information.' The U.S. government defines this as any information, written or spoken, provided in confidence to U.S. officials by their foreign counterparts. 
This sort of information, which the department says Clinton both sent and received in her emails, is the only kind that must be "presumed" classified, in part to protect national security and the integrity of diplomatic interactions, according to U.S. regulations examined by Reuters 
"It's born classified," said J. William Leonard, a former director of the U.S. government's Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO). Leonard was director of ISOO, part of the White House's National Archives and Records Administration, from 2002 until 2008, and worked for both the Bill Clinton and George W. Bush administrations.
What kind of information ?
FOR THE SECRETARY'S EYES ONLY 
Clinton and her senior staff routinely sent foreign government information among themselves on unsecured networks several times a month, if the State Department's markings are correct. Within the 30 email threads reviewed by Reuters, Clinton herself sent at least 17 emails that contained this sort of information. In at least one case it was to a friend, Sidney Blumenthal, not in government. 
The information appears to include privately shared comments by a prime minister, several foreign ministers and a foreign spy chief, unredacted bits of the emails show. Typically, Clinton and her staff first learned the information in private meetings, telephone calls or, less often, in email exchanges with the foreign officials. 
In an email from November 2009, the principal private secretary to David Miliband, then the British foreign secretary, indicates that he is passing on information about Afghanistan from his boss in confidence. He writes to Huma Abedin, Clinton's most senior aide, that Miliband "very much wants the Secretary (only) to see this note."

Nearly five pages of entirely redacted information follow. Abedin forwarded it on to Clinton's private email account.
Read the article at Reuters... 

Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Media Ignores Obama & Romney call for REAL Fact-Check in the Debate over G.M.

Another Fact-Check Fail by the LEFT
McClatchy Writes

Facts and fiction in foreign policy debate

President Barack Obama and Republican challenger Mitt Romney traded barbs on foreign policy Monday night, dueling over everything from military spending to Middle East events to how best to stop Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon.
In the last of three high-stakes presidential debates, not everything they said at Lynn University in the Florida beach city of Boca Raton squared with reality. Here’s a fact check of some of what they said:
SYRIA:
LIBYA:
IRAN:
IRAQ:MILITARY MATTERS:
.EGYPT:LATIN AMERICA:
 ========================================================================

Strange the Main Stream Media wouldn't fact-check the part of the debate where BOTH candidates ask to actually check their statements. Where else in the entire debate did they call for another?   Turns out the GM OpEd statement made by Romney was CORRECT and Obama was caught in ANOTHER Flat-out LIE.  Here is the Video and quotes from the Times Op Ed.  

 

The Hill Fails to Fact Check or run a column on the GM Statement. Obama's remarks go unchallenged and this is the best The Hill.com can do   Obama: 'We might not have an auto industry’ if Romney had been president  They dont even challenge the remarks. Again, Both candidates say check the facts.
========================================================================

Of course the propagandists at @MSNBC at the Maddow Blog ran with this disinformation piece.    Setting the record straight on the auto rescue

Excerpt:
In a debate in which many of the disputes are subjective, it's nice to have an argument in which there's an objective truth. Romney told viewers last night that his position was that American auto makers "can get government help and government guarantees" as part of the bankruptcy process.
Depending on how generous one is inclined to be, this is either a lie or a stunning case of "Romnesia."
Jonathan Cohn, who's done some great reporting on the auto rescue in recent years, noted Romney's condemnation during the Republican primaries of using public funds for the industry. Here's what Romney said during a debate in late 2011:
"My view with regards to the bailout was that whether it was by President Bush or by President Obama, it was the wrong way to go. I said from the very beginning they should go through a managed bankruptcy process, a private bankruptcy process. We have capital markets and bankruptcy. ... My plan, we would have had a private sector bailout with the private sector restructuring and bankruptcy with the private sector guiding the direction as opposed to what we had with government playing its heavy hand."
As a substantive matter, this didn't make any sense -- capital markets were frozen at the height of the crisis, and the money simply wasn't there. It was either the government or nothing. Last night, Romney argued the opposite of his position, saying he supported auto makers getting "government help."
By any measure, this isn't just a flip-flop; it's failing to tell the truth about a flip-flop.
And in terms of political salience, all of this only serves as a reminder to the nation -- most notably some folks in Ohio -- that if Romney had his way, the American auto industry would have collapsed, waiting for private investment that would have never come.
=========================================================================
Red Herring and Strawmen. MSNBC  gets caught with yet another piece of propaganda. First, they don't even reference the NYTimes Op Ed piece from the debate that the EDITORS TITLED.  Let Detroit Go Bankrupt   or even mention that Fiat took over Chrysler in the frozen capital market. The Main Stream Media and Barack Obama don't dwell in facts or truths, they perpetuate lies and push agendas.



TARP Overseer Neil Barofsky on Bailouts & Obama
Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2012/10/22/172265/facts-and-fiction-in-foreign-policy.html#storylink=cpy

Friday, January 20, 2012

Rolling Stone - The Occupy Wall Street Propaganda Machine

Rolling Stone is caught RED-HANDED with a propaganda piece pushing the agenda of Occupy Wall Street, all at the expense of the Oakland Police Dept. The author of the Rolling Stone article Mark Binelli failed to report the truth, further spreading the lie that Scott Olsen was shot by police.  Scott Olsen: Casualty of the Occupation
 The incident based on facts as follows:
 The Attack on Scott Olsen at Occupy Oakland - Propaganda or MORE?
This catalyst for a day of strikes in Oakland is really based on an anarchist attacking a Vet. There is no coverage, outrage or apologies to the Oakland Police Dept. 
Rolling Stone Article Jan 19 2012
S F Examiner 10/31/2011  



Sparks that blow up behind him, not gas
On the ground , no gas canister




Howard Zinn on the New Left - Anarchic Marxism



#occupyoakland #oo #occupywallstreet #rollingstone #propaganda #scottolsen #oakland #occupier #bradleymanning #anarchist #falseflag #teargas #occupyboston #occupychicago #marine #vet #occupyoakland #ihatethemarines #scottolsen #teargascanister    Occupy Wall Street - Scripted by Global Interests