Antifa Plays a Game Of Monopoly on Power

In light of recent events it might be worth your while to view the events in America's cities through a different lense. How you view poltical power and its use is very important and is part of how the events will be framed. Framing is a great way to control the narrative

Take the politcal heat or blame the black power and antifa riots on someone else and change the narrative back in your favor ?

The Democrati party political machine will control the narrative aided by their media partners so lets get back to the monopoly on power and political violence. The poltical left has it mastered.

A video


Now combine that take with Andy Ngo's :

an Excerpt: 

The destruction of businesses we’re witnessing across the US is not mere opportunism by looters. It plays a critical role in antifa and BLM ideology. Their stated goal is to abolish capitalism. To do that, they have to make economic recovery impossible. Antifa sees a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to exploit an economically weakened America during the coronavirus pandemic. It’s Going Down, one of the most popular antifa blogs in North America, tweeted on Friday: ’10 years from now, people won’t look back and ask: “Why did it explode in 2020?” Massive unemployment while the rich rake in billions from tax-cuts + bailouts, the earth on the brink of collapse + police murdering people daily. Instead they’ll ask: “Why didn’t it happen sooner?”‘

There are many questions as to why the Democrat Mayors and Governor didn't push back on their poltical allies / members of their coalition. Questions why the members of the media didn't hold their poltical allies in power accountable. The State has a Monopoly on power so if you want to know who controls that you follow the Monopoly money.

Obamagate: The Unmasking of Joe Biden

The same entities that pushed the Trump Putin collusion lie will be quick to tell you Obamagate isn't real or it is a diversion. The very fact that the Trump Putin collusion story is a lie leads right to the top of the Obama administration. The full story is complex and developing but recent news in the Michael Flynn case reveals quite alot. 

For instance, Joe Biden was in the know about Obama targeting Flynn in the last weeks of the administration. In fact. Joe Biden unmasked Flynn's name on January 12, 2017 which is just a week shy of leaving office. It appears Joe Biden Jr. doesn't really have an answer and the MSM doesn't seem too concerned. What does legal scholar Jonathan Turley have to say?

The declassification of material from the Michael Flynn case has exposed more chilling details of an effort by prosecutors to come up with a crime to use against the former national security adviser. This week, however, a letter revealed another unsettling detail. Among over three dozen Obama administration officials seeking to “unmask” Flynn in the investigation was former Vice President Joe Biden. This revelation came less than a day after Biden denied any involvement in the investigation of Flynn. It also follows a disclosure that President Obama was aware of that investigation.

For three years, many in the media have expressed horror at the notion of the Trump campaign colluding with Russia to influence the 2016 election. We know there was never credible evidence of such collusion. In recently released transcripts, a long list of Obama administration officials admitted they never saw any evidence of such Russian collusion. That included the testimony of Evelyn Farkas, a former White House adviser who was widely quoted by the media with her public plea for Congress to gather all of the evidence that she learned of as part of the Obama administration.

The media covered her concern that this evidence would be lost “if they found out how we knew what we knew” about Trump campaign officials “dealing with Russians.” Yet in her classified testimony under oath, she said she did not know anything. Farkas is now running for Congress in New York and highlighting her role in raising “alarm” over collusion. As much of the media blindly pushed this story, a worrying story unfolded over the use of federal power to investigate political opponents.

There is very little question that the response by the media to such a story would have been overwhelming if George Bush and his administration had targeted the Obama campaign figures with secret surveillance. That story would have been encompassing if it was learned that there was no direct evidence to justify the investigation and that the underlying allegation of Russian collusion was ultimately found to lack a credible basis.

But the motives of Obama administration officials are apparently not to be questioned. Indeed, back when candidate Donald Trump said the Obama administration placed his campaign officials under surveillance, the media universally mocked him. That statement was later proven to be true. The Obama administration used the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act court to conduct surveillance of Trump campaign officials.

Yet none of this matters as the media remains fully invested in the original false allegations of collusion. If Obama administration officials were to be questioned now, the coverage and judgment of the media may be placed into question, as even this latest disclosure from the investigation of the unmasking request of Biden will not alter the media narrative.

Unmasking occurs when an official asks an intelligence agency to remove anonymous designations hiding the identity of an individual. This masking is a very important protection of the privacy of American citizens who are caught up in national security surveillance. The importance of this privacy protection is being dismissed by media figures, like Andrea Mitchell, who declared the Biden story to be nothing more than gaslighting.

While unmasking is more routinely requested by intelligence officials, with a reported 10,000 such requests by the National Security Agency last year alone, it is presumably less common for figures like Biden or White House chief of staff Denis McDonough. Seeking unmasking information that was likely to reveal the name of a political opponent and possibly damage the Trump administration raises a concern. More importantly, it adds a detail of the scope of interest and involvement in an investigation that targeted Flynn without any compelling evidence of a crime or collusion.

The media portrayed both Obama and Biden as uninvolved. But now we know they both actively followed the investigation. According to former acting attorney general Sally Yates, she was surprised that Obama knew about the investigation and knew more than she did at the time. Obama called upon former FBI director James Comey to stay after a meeting to discuss the investigation. Comey had mentioned using the Logan Act to charge Flynn, even though the unconstitutional law has never been used successfully in a prosecution since the country was founded.

Biden has repeatedly denied knowledge of the investigation. Just a day before the latest disclosure, George Stephanopoulos asked Biden in an interview what he knew of the Flynn investigation. Biden was adamant that he knew nothing about “those moves” and he called it a diversion. But that is not true if he took the relatively uncommon action for a vice president of demanding the unmasking of Flynn information.

Yet none of this matters. A Democratic administration using a secret court to investigate the opposing political campaign does not matter to many in Congress or in the media anyway. An investigation continuing despite the lack of credible information supporting collusion does not matter to them either. A president and a vice president who take personal interest in the surveillance of their political opponents also does not matter.There was a time, however, when all of this did matter. There was once a time when this would be viewed as the story of the century, including the unmasking of Biden himself in this investigation. But these are not those times, and this cannot be the story. Russian collusion is the story and, as Biden stressed, the rest is just a diversion. It is up to the public to decide who has been ultimately unmasked by the Flynn investigation.

Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University.

BTW, in case you think Obama isn't involved either.
First, Obama surprised Yates with discussion of Flynn investigation.
Second, Obama's chief of staff unmasks Flynn on same day.

 A timeline of unmasking:

Finally, I will leave you a picture of Obama's legacy.

Silent Coup , Soft Coup - Obama's Legacy

The Obama admin's soft coup is now a matter of public record yet the media MUST ignore that white elephant in the room since they were active participants . So many lies and leaks were required to accomplish this goal some were bound be be exposed. Lets define a soft coup.

From Wikipedia

A soft coup that manifested itself in different ways. Disguised and distorted but in full view. Watching some of it over time has been fascinating.

The Flynn documents and the 'Russia collusion' transcripts are further eye openers. The first and best hidden gem from the transcripts. There is no proof the Russians hacked the DNC servers.  

A little more background on Crowdstrike and their connections to the Clinton/DNC machine.

Not only were the claims of Russia hacking the DNC never proven much more evidence indicates the DNC information was leaked.




Not only was the Russia hacking story BS, the Democrats and their media allies would continue the Clinton campaign strategy of attacking Trump on Russia but now the story would be Trump-Putin collusion. To make that connection stick Trump associates like Michael Flynn would be targeted next.

Podesta email

Target Flynn using dangerous and dirty leaks requiring top level access and authority

Yet with all of the spying, the Obama admin and the alphabet agencies really found NOTHING.

Not only was Flynn railroaded but it appears to be at the behest of Barack Obama.

Corrupt FBI agants like Peter Strzok abuse his office and the FISA process. Footsoldiers in the Flynn Flim Flam.

FBI agents with FISA court connections would help .... Even better a personal connection with Michael Flynn's judge, a daily double.

The same FBI agent Peter Strzok who made it possible for Hillary Clinton to avoid espionage charges and was placed on the Mueller probe too .....

Of course, the FBI can be a little and conveniently and curiously careless too ....

Glad tne Inspector General could find them

Along with spying and lying comes leaking. The top FBI agents helped leak and spin the story.

The Steele dossier made the FISA warrants poosible agains the Trump campaign. Making the phoney Steele dossier public was the job of CIA's John Brennan and the Democrat Senator Harry Reid.

The discredited dossier, some hacks still argue it is 'proven' 

Sen. Harry Reid and Dem Leadership were in on the LIEs pushed by CIA's Brennan

The despicable GOP Senator John McCain was another peddler of lies known as FusionGPS's Steele dossier. 

Consider this Cliff's Notes on the lies knows as Russia Russia Russia and the media's eagerness to parrot the anti-Trump narrative for years. Barack the abuser of power and process is not aa acceptable narrative thus paving the way for Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton to continue to get a pass as well. If this is news to you you might want to change your news channel. 

Hipster Hotspot Of Hate Halts Hospitality

In the spirit of rage bait clicks and fighting hypocrisy at the same time I bring you the following story.

Obviously I don't have to tell you about the HATE on display when it is in your FACE. South Mpls a harbor of hate in back MUDDY WATERS of the mighty Mississippi ? Okay, Uptown or the Lyn-Lake neighborhood more specifically. Now back to the standards of leftist defined hate and open hypocrisy .....

Exhibit A:

Exhibit B

Well, if the BBC/NPR/ADL/DFL say it is hate I can't argue. Those are your rules. So if you thought Democrat run Minneapolis only harbored Hamas' honey Ilhan Omar there really is much more to find in Minnesota.