Sunday, November 22, 2020

Joe Biden to Announce First Cabinet Pick - Did BIG Banks Select the Democrat Cabinet AGAIN ?

Great news for America, Joe Biden will announce his first cabinet pick. There has been some 'speculation' as to his pick but odds are the insiders have long known. Call me jaded or a conspiracy theorist or call Citibank and ask who their picks are .... after all Michael Froman from Citibank seemed to basically select the last cabinet under Obama and Biden. 

A quick flashback to 2008
The most important revelation in the WikiLeaks dump of John Podesta’s emails has nothing to do with Hillary Clinton. The messages go all the way back to 2008, when Podesta served as co-chair of President-elect Barack Obama’s transition team. And a month before the election, the key staffing for that future administration was almost entirely in place, revealing that some of the most crucial decisions an administration can make occur well before a vote has been cast.

Michael Froman, who is now U.S. trade representative but at the time was an executive at Citigroup, wrote an email to Podesta on October 6, 2008, with the subject “Lists.” Froman used a Citigroup email address. He attached three documents: a list of women for top administration jobs, a list of non-white candidates, and a sample outline of 31 cabinet-level positions and who would fill them. “The lists will continue to grow,” Froman wrote to Podesta, “but these are the names to date that seem to be coming up as recommended by various sources for senior level jobs.”

The cabinet list ended up being almost entirely on the money. It correctly identified Eric Holder for the Justice Department, Janet Napolitano for Homeland Security, Robert Gates for Defense, Rahm Emanuel for chief of staff, Peter Orszag for the Office of Management and Budget, Arne Duncan for Education, Eric Shinseki for Veterans Affairs, Kathleen Sebelius for Health and Human Services, Melody Barnes for the Domestic Policy Council, and more. For the Treasury, three possibilities were on the list: Robert Rubin, Larry Summers, and Timothy Geithner

Or as zerohedge reported


 

The media played defense for Obama/Biden for 8 years and went on offense against Trump for 5 years. As the media shifts back to defend the Democrat party, the corporate media can hardly speak truth to power when they are ALL owned by the same interests. 
 

Monday, October 12, 2020

The Main Reason Senate Democrats Can't Question Amy Coney Barrett's Qualifications

Of course it slipped your mind and the Democrat PR firms like WaPo or CNN won't remind you. Why can't the Democrats and their media allies honestly question ACB about experience ? Elena. 

Yep, it turns out if you are a Democrat you don't need any real experience for the job, even the Supreme Court of the United States. Heck, even POTUS, ask Barry Soetoro. 






If the Kavanaugh FREAK SHOW wasn't enough, the Democrats will still find a way to out do themselves in the ACB hearing. Need any more proof the Democrats aren't capable of oversight ,  advise and consent or leading the country?

Saturday, September 26, 2020

Blacktivists Corner Their Market of Hate

The Democrat party is a coalition of abbreviated and hyphenated-Americans that has long been home to race hustling grifters and other forms of grievance merchants. 


Racehustling grifters, past and present ...

Obama, Sharpton and BLM's Deray ...

The hours and the pay are EXCELLENT ....

If you doubt that this racehustling is a grift and America truly is a systemically racist country, why do people pretend to be black or minority as part of their con ? Ask Elizabeth Warren ?



Maybe ask Talcum X ?



Or Rachel Dolezal ?


The grift is out in the open but the media openly defends anything BLM 



In case you haven't figured it out by now, bigots make everything about race and so do Democrats Tribalism is the easiest way to divide and conquer 



Woke is Racist. 

Thursday, August 13, 2020

Fake Indian Activist Charged With Felony For Toppling Columbus Statue in St Paul

 Of course my blog headline might conflict with the story from Minnesota Public Radio. 


The American Indian Movement 'activist' took full advantage of the moral panic to go full taliban and tear down some statues. They faced little or no resistance from the poice which were controlled by their politicall allies. 

 Of coure, there is some more to the story.  How about this fact that somehow got overlooked. 


Now we have seen the bodycam footage from the arresting officers in the Goerge Floyd arrest and it is obvious the narrative is a LIE. If you needed another glimpse at the ugliness of the left's politics witnessing the lies, riots and mini cultural revolution should be enough. While calling all others fascist, the leftist totalitarion freaks are playing to win and at any cost. 

Tuesday, July 28, 2020

George Floyd Riot Umbrella Man Unmasked Again ?


The George Floyd  riots in Minneapolis/St. Paul had quite a few substories but one of the internet's favorites was the 'Umrbella Man'. Well the story is back  with a new twist. Gone are the days of Umbrella Man as a cop and now official investigators have a hot new lead. 


It now turns out Umbrella Man is ....


Not only is Umbrella man a Hells Angels member he is also a white supremacist ....


Oh no, not only is Umbrella Man a Hells Angel Aryan Nation White Supremacist, he also racially harasses Muslim women.


Oh dear, he made eye contact and made her uncomfortable. Definitely a hate crime ? Is it odd these two stories collide ? The story insists Umbrella Man caused the rioting and looting, even though the looting started the day before ....

Saturday, June 20, 2020

Racism & The Public Health Emergency Powerplay

The corona virus / COVID19 lockdown plus the Democrat party coalition's race riots and cultural revolution are connected in many ways this election season. As time passes it may be easier to see we are further down a slippery slope the left is eagerly pushing us down.

Those that rule over you shut down the economy for the 'non essential' , told you to stay at home etc. and you accepted that because it was the 'right thing to do' to stop SARSCov2. Flatten the curve became shutdown until we find a cure. The economy is still hobbled by decree of the state and local governments and their 'public health emergency' declarations. It seems like a lot of power easily given.


MINNEAPOLIS (WCCO) — Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey declared a local public health emergency Monday in response to the threat of COVID-19. 
The mayor’s declaration must be voted on by the city council within 72 hours.
The Minnesota Department of Health said Monday that the number of coronavirus (COVID-19) cases in the state has climbed from 35 to 54. 
Continued:
Upon declaration of a local emergency, the mayor is granted additional powers, authorities and responsibilities, according to the Minneapolis Code of Ordinances. 
The local emergency cannot be continued for more than three days unless the city council gives consent. Frey has requested the emergency declaration to remain in effect for as long as the State of Minnesota peacetime emergency declaration remains in effect.
A public health emergency is a lot of power that could be abused ? Consider the following and potential for abuse:








Public health emergencies are an easy route for CONTROL and the roadmap is familiar.



But I digress. The Democrats' racehustle and cultural revolution in election year 2020 is dangerous to us all. If racism is like a virus that only white people can have what are the limits for the left ?





Sunday, May 31, 2020

Antifa Plays a Game Of Monopoly on Power

In light of recent events it might be worth your while to view the events in America's cities through a different lense. How you view poltical power and its use is very important and is part of how the events will be framed. Framing is a great way to control the narrative


Take the politcal heat or blame the black power and antifa riots on someone else and change the narrative back in your favor ?



The Democrati party political machine will control the narrative aided by their media partners so lets get back to the monopoly on power and political violence. The poltical left has it mastered.

A video


Now combine that take with Andy Ngo's :


an Excerpt: 
The destruction of businesses we’re witnessing across the US is not mere opportunism by looters. It plays a critical role in antifa and BLM ideology. Their stated goal is to abolish capitalism. To do that, they have to make economic recovery impossible. Antifa sees a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to exploit an economically weakened America during the coronavirus pandemic. It’s Going Down, one of the most popular antifa blogs in North America, tweeted on Friday: ’10 years from now, people won’t look back and ask: “Why did it explode in 2020?” Massive unemployment while the rich rake in billions from tax-cuts + bailouts, the earth on the brink of collapse + police murdering people daily. Instead they’ll ask: “Why didn’t it happen sooner?”‘
There are many questions as to why the Democrat Mayors and Governor didn't push back on their poltical allies / members of their coalition. Questions why the members of the media didn't hold their poltical allies in power accountable. The State has a Monopoly on power so if you want to know who controls that you follow the Monopoly money.


Sunday, May 17, 2020

Obamagate: The Unmasking of Joe Biden

The same entities that pushed the Trump Putin collusion lie will be quick to tell you Obamagate isn't real or it is a diversion. The very fact that the Trump Putin collusion story is a lie leads right to the top of the Obama administration. The full story is complex and developing but recent news in the Michael Flynn case reveals quite alot. 



For instance, Joe Biden was in the know about Obama targeting Flynn in the last weeks of the administration. In fact. Joe Biden unmasked Flynn's name on January 12, 2017 which is just a week shy of leaving office. It appears Joe Biden Jr. doesn't really have an answer and the MSM doesn't seem too concerned. What does legal scholar Jonathan Turley have to say?
The declassification of material from the Michael Flynn case has exposed more chilling details of an effort by prosecutors to come up with a crime to use against the former national security adviser. This week, however, a letter revealed another unsettling detail. Among over three dozen Obama administration officials seeking to “unmask” Flynn in the investigation was former Vice President Joe Biden. This revelation came less than a day after Biden denied any involvement in the investigation of Flynn. It also follows a disclosure that President Obama was aware of that investigation.

For three years, many in the media have expressed horror at the notion of the Trump campaign colluding with Russia to influence the 2016 election. We know there was never credible evidence of such collusion. In recently released transcripts, a long list of Obama administration officials admitted they never saw any evidence of such Russian collusion. That included the testimony of Evelyn Farkas, a former White House adviser who was widely quoted by the media with her public plea for Congress to gather all of the evidence that she learned of as part of the Obama administration.
The media covered her concern that this evidence would be lost “if they found out how we knew what we knew” about Trump campaign officials “dealing with Russians.” Yet in her classified testimony under oath, she said she did not know anything. Farkas is now running for Congress in New York and highlighting her role in raising “alarm” over collusion. As much of the media blindly pushed this story, a worrying story unfolded over the use of federal power to investigate political opponents.
There is very little question that the response by the media to such a story would have been overwhelming if George Bush and his administration had targeted the Obama campaign figures with secret surveillance. That story would have been encompassing if it was learned that there was no direct evidence to justify the investigation and that the underlying allegation of Russian collusion was ultimately found to lack a credible basis.

But the motives of Obama administration officials are apparently not to be questioned. Indeed, back when candidate Donald Trump said the Obama administration placed his campaign officials under surveillance, the media universally mocked him. That statement was later proven to be true. The Obama administration used the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act court to conduct surveillance of Trump campaign officials.

Yet none of this matters as the media remains fully invested in the original false allegations of collusion. If Obama administration officials were to be questioned now, the coverage and judgment of the media may be placed into question, as even this latest disclosure from the investigation of the unmasking request of Biden will not alter the media narrative.

Unmasking occurs when an official asks an intelligence agency to remove anonymous designations hiding the identity of an individual. This masking is a very important protection of the privacy of American citizens who are caught up in national security surveillance. The importance of this privacy protection is being dismissed by media figures, like Andrea Mitchell, who declared the Biden story to be nothing more than gaslighting.


While unmasking is more routinely requested by intelligence officials, with a reported 10,000 such requests by the National Security Agency last year alone, it is presumably less common for figures like Biden or White House chief of staff Denis McDonough. Seeking unmasking information that was likely to reveal the name of a political opponent and possibly damage the Trump administration raises a concern. More importantly, it adds a detail of the scope of interest and involvement in an investigation that targeted Flynn without any compelling evidence of a crime or collusion.

The media portrayed both Obama and Biden as uninvolved. But now we know they both actively followed the investigation. According to former acting attorney general Sally Yates, she was surprised that Obama knew about the investigation and knew more than she did at the time. Obama called upon former FBI director James Comey to stay after a meeting to discuss the investigation. Comey had mentioned using the Logan Act to charge Flynn, even though the unconstitutional law has never been used successfully in a prosecution since the country was founded.

Biden has repeatedly denied knowledge of the investigation. Just a day before the latest disclosure, George Stephanopoulos asked Biden in an interview what he knew of the Flynn investigation. Biden was adamant that he knew nothing about “those moves” and he called it a diversion. But that is not true if he took the relatively uncommon action for a vice president of demanding the unmasking of Flynn information.

Yet none of this matters. A Democratic administration using a secret court to investigate the opposing political campaign does not matter to many in Congress or in the media anyway. An investigation continuing despite the lack of credible information supporting collusion does not matter to them either. A president and a vice president who take personal interest in the surveillance of their political opponents also does not matter.There was a time, however, when all of this did matter. There was once a time when this would be viewed as the story of the century, including the unmasking of Biden himself in this investigation. But these are not those times, and this cannot be the story. Russian collusion is the story and, as Biden stressed, the rest is just a diversion. It is up to the public to decide who has been ultimately unmasked by the Flynn investigation.

Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University.
BTW, in case you think Obama isn't involved either.
First, Obama surprised Yates with discussion of Flynn investigation.
Second, Obama's chief of staff unmasks Flynn on same day.

 A timeline of unmasking:


Finally, I will leave you a picture of Obama's legacy.




Sunday, May 10, 2020

Silent Coup , Soft Coup - Obama's Legacy

The Obama admin's soft coup is now a matter of public record yet the media MUST ignore that white elephant in the room since they were active participants . So many lies and leaks were required to accomplish this goal some were bound be be exposed. Lets define a soft coup.

From Wikipedia
A soft coup that manifested itself in different ways. Disguised and distorted but in full view. Watching some of it over time has been fascinating.



The Flynn documents and the 'Russia collusion' transcripts are further eye openers. The first and best hidden gem from the transcripts. There is no proof the Russians hacked the DNC servers.  

A little more background on Crowdstrike and their connections to the Clinton/DNC machine.





Not only were the claims of Russia hacking the DNC never proven much more evidence indicates the DNC information was leaked.




Not only was the Russia hacking story BS, the Democrats and their media allies would continue the Clinton campaign strategy of attacking Trump on Russia but now the story would be Trump-Putin collusion. To make that connection stick Trump associates like Michael Flynn would be targeted next.

Podesta email

Target Flynn using dangerous and dirty leaks requiring top level access and authority


Yet with all of the spying, the Obama admin and the alphabet agencies really found NOTHING.




Not only was Flynn railroaded but it appears to be at the behest of Barack Obama.


Corrupt FBI agants like Peter Strzok abuse his office and the FISA process. Footsoldiers in the Flynn Flim Flam.

FBI agents with FISA court connections would help .... Even better a personal connection with Michael Flynn's judge, a daily double.


The same FBI agent Peter Strzok who made it possible for Hillary Clinton to avoid espionage charges and was placed on the Mueller probe too .....




Of course, the FBI can be a little and conveniently and curiously careless too ....

Glad tne Inspector General could find them


Along with spying and lying comes leaking. The top FBI agents helped leak and spin the story.


The Steele dossier made the FISA warrants poosible agains the Trump campaign. Making the phoney Steele dossier public was the job of CIA's John Brennan and the Democrat Senator Harry Reid.

The discredited dossier, some hacks still argue it is 'proven' 

Sen. Harry Reid and Dem Leadership were in on the LIEs pushed by CIA's Brennan


The despicable GOP Senator John McCain was another peddler of lies known as FusionGPS's Steele dossier. 


Consider this Cliff's Notes on the lies knows as Russia Russia Russia and the media's eagerness to parrot the anti-Trump narrative for years. Barack the abuser of power and process is not aa acceptable narrative thus paving the way for Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton to continue to get a pass as well. If this is news to you you might want to change your news channel.