MSNBC's O'Donnell: Candidates Should Have Staff Backup During Debates .....

MSNBC's O'Donnell: Candidates Should Have Staff Backup During Debates, The Presidency Is Not "Oral Exams & Memory Quizzes"

 

MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell devised this plan to turn presidential debates into a team sport in response to President Biden's performance last week:

 "A candidate should be allowed to have staff members answer   questions for them," he said.
"That's the way the presidency actually works. The presidency does not involve oral exams and memory quizzes."

Debate Forces Corporate Media to Admit Biden's Impairment After Months of Lies

2 weeks later

Corruption & Coverup: Is THIS Joe Biden's NIXON TAPES moment?

The open corruption of the Biden administration is the great uniparty white elephant in the room that we can't talk about. The media has proven itself to be the danger to democracy that they themselves prattle on about.  The uniparty hates Trump and that must be our only focus no matter how high the establishment jumps the shark or how many times. The Biden corruption makes their god Obama look bad once again so deflection and protection is the legacy media's main mission. Protect the uniparty and the agenda. Stick to the narrative.  Think the evidence isn't overwhelming at this point ?

Still nothing to see here ?

You can watch Hunter Biden's business partner Devon Archer talk about some of their dealings. Not so oddly enough, Devon Archer seems to always remove himself from any of the wrong doing .....

Part 2

>

As reported by CBS

And more from yet another Hunter Biden business partner.

Whistleblowers, coverups, shell corps, burner phones, slow walking investigations, stonewalling and so much more. But Trump the orange man is bad and a danger to democracy ? Do you really believe that and do you buy their distractions ? Why are so many people willing to stay silent on Biden's open corruption while manufacturing charges against Trump, his political rival ? There is no deep state and no obvious coordination with corporate media ? No uniparty ? No swamp ? What happened to the TeaParty when they wanted to defund it all ? Did you try to question the lockdowns and mandates ? Maybe have a few questions on election 2020 or climate alarmism ? 

No questions about any of the above ? Then they must have given you a very warm welcome to the machine. I will let you finish your cigar, you are gonna go far.

Obama Admin's 2014 Bloody Coup in Ukraine was Lead by V.P. Joe Biden

Silent Coup , Soft Coup - Obama's Legacy

Eerie: NY Governor Sends in National Guard after Migrant Sexual Assaults

Welcome to Biden's open border America. Where democrats proudly boast of their Sanctuary Cities until they have to pay for it. Then all bets are off.as NYC ships out their ILLEGALS a.k.a. fake asylum seekers to unsuspecting and/or gullible outstate locations, if not CANADA  The reaction from the left has been fun to watch

 

 

 That small video clip from last Wednesday now takes us to the end of the week in Erie County, New York. 

 

Problems at the different "migrant centers"  aren't getting much attention, by design. The legacy media is no champion of truth obviously. Sexual assaults and sending in the national guard went under the radar too. Considering the fact democrats won't use the national guard to stop looting, arson and murder in the cities it seems at least a little news worthy. 

 

 

 

And the democrats will do NOTHING about the open border and will continue to push for more amnesty based plans because it gives them a political advantage. Just see how cynically they have used DACA. I will leave you with this immigration flashback classic

 

Joe Biden to Announce First Cabinet Pick - Did BIG Banks Select the Democrat Cabinet AGAIN ?

Great news for America, Joe Biden will announce his first cabinet pick. There has been some 'speculation' as to his pick but odds are the insiders have long known. Call me jaded or a conspiracy theorist or call Citibank and ask who their picks are .... after all Michael Froman from Citibank seemed to basically select the last cabinet under Obama and Biden. 

A quick flashback to 2008

The most important revelation in the WikiLeaks dump of John Podesta’s emails has nothing to do with Hillary Clinton. The messages go all the way back to 2008, when Podesta served as co-chair of President-elect Barack Obama’s transition team. And a month before the election, the key staffing for that future administration was almost entirely in place, revealing that some of the most crucial decisions an administration can make occur well before a vote has been cast.

Michael Froman, who is now U.S. trade representative but at the time was an executive at Citigroup, wrote an email to Podesta on October 6, 2008, with the subject “Lists.” Froman used a Citigroup email address. He attached three documents: a list of women for top administration jobs, a list of non-white candidates, and a sample outline of 31 cabinet-level positions and who would fill them. “The lists will continue to grow,” Froman wrote to Podesta, “but these are the names to date that seem to be coming up as recommended by various sources for senior level jobs.”

The cabinet list ended up being almost entirely on the money. It correctly identified Eric Holder for the Justice Department, Janet Napolitano for Homeland Security, Robert Gates for Defense, Rahm Emanuel for chief of staff, Peter Orszag for the Office of Management and Budget, Arne Duncan for Education, Eric Shinseki for Veterans Affairs, Kathleen Sebelius for Health and Human Services, Melody Barnes for the Domestic Policy Council, and more. For the Treasury, three possibilities were on the list: Robert Rubin, Larry Summers, and Timothy Geithner

Or as zerohedge reported

 

The media played defense for Obama/Biden for 8 years and went on offense against Trump for 5 years. As the media shifts back to defend the Democrat party, the corporate media can hardly speak truth to power when they are ALL owned by the same interests. 
 

Obamagate: The Unmasking of Joe Biden

The same entities that pushed the Trump Putin collusion lie will be quick to tell you Obamagate isn't real or it is a diversion. The very fact that the Trump Putin collusion story is a lie leads right to the top of the Obama administration. The full story is complex and developing but recent news in the Michael Flynn case reveals quite alot. 

For instance, Joe Biden was in the know about Obama targeting Flynn in the last weeks of the administration. In fact. Joe Biden unmasked Flynn's name on January 12, 2017 which is just a week shy of leaving office. It appears Joe Biden Jr. doesn't really have an answer and the MSM doesn't seem too concerned. What does legal scholar Jonathan Turley have to say?

The declassification of material from the Michael Flynn case has exposed more chilling details of an effort by prosecutors to come up with a crime to use against the former national security adviser. This week, however, a letter revealed another unsettling detail. Among over three dozen Obama administration officials seeking to “unmask” Flynn in the investigation was former Vice President Joe Biden. This revelation came less than a day after Biden denied any involvement in the investigation of Flynn. It also follows a disclosure that President Obama was aware of that investigation.

For three years, many in the media have expressed horror at the notion of the Trump campaign colluding with Russia to influence the 2016 election. We know there was never credible evidence of such collusion. In recently released transcripts, a long list of Obama administration officials admitted they never saw any evidence of such Russian collusion. That included the testimony of Evelyn Farkas, a former White House adviser who was widely quoted by the media with her public plea for Congress to gather all of the evidence that she learned of as part of the Obama administration.

The media covered her concern that this evidence would be lost “if they found out how we knew what we knew” about Trump campaign officials “dealing with Russians.” Yet in her classified testimony under oath, she said she did not know anything. Farkas is now running for Congress in New York and highlighting her role in raising “alarm” over collusion. As much of the media blindly pushed this story, a worrying story unfolded over the use of federal power to investigate political opponents.

There is very little question that the response by the media to such a story would have been overwhelming if George Bush and his administration had targeted the Obama campaign figures with secret surveillance. That story would have been encompassing if it was learned that there was no direct evidence to justify the investigation and that the underlying allegation of Russian collusion was ultimately found to lack a credible basis.

But the motives of Obama administration officials are apparently not to be questioned. Indeed, back when candidate Donald Trump said the Obama administration placed his campaign officials under surveillance, the media universally mocked him. That statement was later proven to be true. The Obama administration used the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act court to conduct surveillance of Trump campaign officials.

Yet none of this matters as the media remains fully invested in the original false allegations of collusion. If Obama administration officials were to be questioned now, the coverage and judgment of the media may be placed into question, as even this latest disclosure from the investigation of the unmasking request of Biden will not alter the media narrative.

Unmasking occurs when an official asks an intelligence agency to remove anonymous designations hiding the identity of an individual. This masking is a very important protection of the privacy of American citizens who are caught up in national security surveillance. The importance of this privacy protection is being dismissed by media figures, like Andrea Mitchell, who declared the Biden story to be nothing more than gaslighting.

While unmasking is more routinely requested by intelligence officials, with a reported 10,000 such requests by the National Security Agency last year alone, it is presumably less common for figures like Biden or White House chief of staff Denis McDonough. Seeking unmasking information that was likely to reveal the name of a political opponent and possibly damage the Trump administration raises a concern. More importantly, it adds a detail of the scope of interest and involvement in an investigation that targeted Flynn without any compelling evidence of a crime or collusion.

The media portrayed both Obama and Biden as uninvolved. But now we know they both actively followed the investigation. According to former acting attorney general Sally Yates, she was surprised that Obama knew about the investigation and knew more than she did at the time. Obama called upon former FBI director James Comey to stay after a meeting to discuss the investigation. Comey had mentioned using the Logan Act to charge Flynn, even though the unconstitutional law has never been used successfully in a prosecution since the country was founded.

Biden has repeatedly denied knowledge of the investigation. Just a day before the latest disclosure, George Stephanopoulos asked Biden in an interview what he knew of the Flynn investigation. Biden was adamant that he knew nothing about “those moves” and he called it a diversion. But that is not true if he took the relatively uncommon action for a vice president of demanding the unmasking of Flynn information.

Yet none of this matters. A Democratic administration using a secret court to investigate the opposing political campaign does not matter to many in Congress or in the media anyway. An investigation continuing despite the lack of credible information supporting collusion does not matter to them either. A president and a vice president who take personal interest in the surveillance of their political opponents also does not matter.There was a time, however, when all of this did matter. There was once a time when this would be viewed as the story of the century, including the unmasking of Biden himself in this investigation. But these are not those times, and this cannot be the story. Russian collusion is the story and, as Biden stressed, the rest is just a diversion. It is up to the public to decide who has been ultimately unmasked by the Flynn investigation.

Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University.

BTW, in case you think Obama isn't involved either.
First, Obama surprised Yates with discussion of Flynn investigation.
Second, Obama's chief of staff unmasks Flynn on same day.

 A timeline of unmasking:

Finally, I will leave you a picture of Obama's legacy.